PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4900T vs Core i3-3210 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4900T vs Core i3-3210: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4900T

2018

Why buy it

✅+23.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $75 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
✅Delivers 179.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.3 vs 19.1 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 55W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,040 vs 1,113).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-3210.

Core i3-3210

2013

Why buy it

✅+7% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Celeron G4900T.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (505 vs 623).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.1 vs 53.3 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌57.1% higher power demand at 55W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4900T better than Core i3-3210?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G4900T is ahead with a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-3210 pulls ahead with 7% better Geekbench multi-core. Core i3-3210 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-3210 is the stronger fit. You are getting 7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G4900T is the better buy right now. Celeron G4900T comes in $75 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $117 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i3-3210 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 7% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 179.8% better value on MSRP (53.3 vs 19.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G4900T vs Core i3-3210 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4900T

The Celeron G4900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,239 points. Launch price was $42.

Core i3-3210

The Core i3-3210 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3072 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,229 points. Launch price was $120.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G4900T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-3210's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G4900T versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-3210 — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-3210 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Celeron G4900T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-3210 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4900T scores 2,239 against the Core i3-3210's 2,229 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G4900T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 623 vs 505, a 20.9% lead for the Celeron G4900T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,040 vs 1,113 (6.8% advantage for the Core i3-3210). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G4900T vs 3072 kB (total) on the Core i3-3210.

Feature	Celeron G4900T	Core i3-3210
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.2 GHz+10%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	3072 kB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,239	2,229
Geekbench 6 Single	623+23%	505
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,040	1,113+7%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4900T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-3210 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4900T versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-3210 — the Celeron G4900T supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4900T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4900T) and B75,H77 (Core i3-3210).

Feature	Celeron G4900T	Core i3-3210
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+50%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G4900T) and HD Graphics 2500 (Core i3-3210) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4900T targets Budget, Core i3-3210 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4900T rivals Pentium G5400T; Core i3-3210 rivals Ryzen 3 1200.

Feature	Celeron G4900T	Core i3-3210
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	HD Graphics 2500
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G4900T was priced at $42, while the Core i3-3210 came in at $117. On launch pricing ($42 vs $117), Celeron G4900T was $75 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4900T delivers 53.3 pts/$ vs 19.1 pts/$ for the Core i3-3210 — making the Celeron G4900T the 94.7% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G4900T	Core i3-3210
MSRP	$42-64%	$117
Performance per Dollar	53.3+179%	19.1
Release Date	2018	2013

Search Celeron G4900T on Amazon

Search Core i3-3210 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.