Celeron G4900T vs Xeon X5472

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4900T vs Xeon X5472 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4900T vs Xeon X5472: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4900T

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Xeon X5472 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,239 vs 2,243).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5472, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Xeon X5472 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X5472

2007

Why buy it

✅+500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5472 better than Celeron G4900T?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5472 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron G4900T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5472 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.0% more average FPS across 35 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5472 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X5472 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon X5472 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 35 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G4900T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (53.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G4900T vs Xeon X5472 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4900T

The Celeron G4900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,239 points. Launch price was $42.

Xeon X5472

The Xeon X5472 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,243 points. Launch price was $958.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G4900T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon X5472 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon X5472 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G4900T versus 3 GHz on the Xeon X5472 — a 3.4% clock advantage for the Xeon X5472 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Celeron G4900T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X5472 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4900T scores 2,239 against the Xeon X5472's 2,243 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon X5472. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G4900T vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5472.

Feature	Celeron G4900T	Xeon X5472
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	12 MB L2 Cache+500%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+4167%	6 MB (total)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark	2,239	2,243
Geekbench 6 Single	623	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,040	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4900T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5472 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G4900T	Xeon X5472
Socket	LGA1151	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4900T) / not specified (Xeon X5472). The Celeron G4900T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Xeon X5472 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4900T rivals Pentium G5400T.