Celeron G4900T vs Core 2 Duo T6500

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4900T vs Core 2 Duo T6500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4900T vs Core 2 Duo T6500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4900T

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Core 2 Duo T6500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,239 vs 2,249).
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo T6500 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.

Core 2 Duo T6500

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G4900T across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4900T better than Core 2 Duo T6500?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G4900T is ahead with a 4.1% average FPS lead across 37 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T6500 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T6500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G4900T is the better buy right now. Celeron G4900T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 37 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core 2 Duo T6500 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (53.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G4900T vs Core 2 Duo T6500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4900T

The Celeron G4900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,239 points. Launch price was $42.

Core 2 Duo T6500

The Core 2 Duo T6500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,249 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G4900T and Core 2 Duo T6500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G4900T versus 2.1 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T6500 — a 32% clock advantage for the Celeron G4900T (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Celeron G4900T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T6500 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4900T scores 2,239 against the Core 2 Duo T6500's 2,249 — a 0.4% lead for the Core 2 Duo T6500. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G4900T vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T6500.

Feature	Celeron G4900T	Core 2 Duo T6500
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+38%	2.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+38%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	2,239	2,249
Geekbench 6 Single	623	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,040	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4900T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T6500 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4900T versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo T6500 — the Celeron G4900T supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4900T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4900T) and PM45 (Core 2 Duo T6500).

Feature	Celeron G4900T	Core 2 Duo T6500
Socket	LGA1151	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+200%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+700%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G4900T) vs false (Core 2 Duo T6500). The Celeron G4900T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core 2 Duo T6500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4900T rivals Pentium G5400T.