PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4900T vs Xeon E5462 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4900T vs Xeon E5462: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4900T

2018

Why buy it

✅+71.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $342 MSRP).
✅Delivers 723.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.3 vs 6.5 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $342 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Xeon E5462 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,040 vs 1,239).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5462, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.

Xeon E5462

2007

Why buy it

✅+19.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (363 vs 623).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.5 vs 53.3 PassMark/$ ($342 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4900T better than Xeon E5462?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5462 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron G4900T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5462 is the stronger fit. You are getting 19.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G4900T is the better buy right now. Celeron G4900T comes in $300 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $342 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 37 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5462 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 19.1% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 723.9% better value on MSRP (53.3 vs 6.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G4900T vs Xeon E5462 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4900T

The Celeron G4900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,239 points. Launch price was $42.

Xeon E5462

The Xeon E5462 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $797.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G4900T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5462 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5462 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G4900T versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5462 — a 3.5% clock advantage for the Celeron G4900T (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron G4900T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5462 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4900T scores 2,239 against the Xeon E5462's 2,213 — a 1.2% lead for the Celeron G4900T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 623 vs 363, a 52.7% lead for the Celeron G4900T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,040 vs 1,239 (17.5% advantage for the Xeon E5462). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G4900T vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5462.

Feature	Celeron G4900T	Xeon E5462
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+4%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+4%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	12 MB L2 Cache+500%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+4167%	6 MB (total)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark	2,239+1%	2,213
Geekbench 6 Single	623+72%	363
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,040	1,239+19%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4900T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5462 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4900T versus DDR2 on the Xeon E5462 — the Celeron G4900T supports 119900% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4900T) and 5000P,3210,G31,P35 (Xeon E5462).

Feature	Celeron G4900T	Xeon E5462
Socket	LGA1151	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+119900%	DDR2
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Celeron G4900T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Xeon E5462 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4900T targets Budget, Xeon E5462 targets Server. Direct competitor: Celeron G4900T rivals Pentium G5400T; Xeon E5462 rivals Athlon 64 X2 4000+.

Feature	Celeron G4900T	Xeon E5462
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G4900T was priced at $42, while the Xeon E5462 came in at $342. On launch pricing ($42 vs $342), Celeron G4900T was $300 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4900T delivers 53.3 pts/$ vs 6.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5462 — making the Celeron G4900T the 156.7% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G4900T	Xeon E5462
MSRP	$42-88%	$342
Performance per Dollar	53.3+720%	6.5
Release Date	2018	2007

Search Celeron G4900T on Amazon

Search Xeon E5462 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.