Celeron G4900T vs Turion II N530

Celeron G4900T vs Turion II N530 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G4900T

2 / 2

2,239

0.0%

2,245

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4900T vs Turion II N530 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4900T vs Turion II N530: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4900T

2018

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Turion II N530 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,239 vs 2,245).
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Turion II N530 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.

Turion II N530

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4900T better than Turion II N530?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G4900T is ahead with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 31 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Turion II N530 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion II N530 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G4900T is the better buy right now. Celeron G4900T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 31 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Turion II N530 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (53.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G4900T vs Turion II N530 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4900T

The Celeron G4900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,239 points. Launch price was $42.

Turion II N530

The Turion II N530 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G4900T and Turion II N530 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G4900T versus 2.5 GHz on the Turion II N530 — a 14.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G4900T. The Celeron G4900T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Turion II N530 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4900T scores 2,239 against the Turion II N530's 2,245 — a 0.3% lead for the Turion II N530.

Feature	Celeron G4900T	Turion II N530
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+16%	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,239	2,245
Geekbench 6 Single	623	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,040	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4900T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion II N530 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G4900T	Turion II N530
Socket	LGA1151	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4900T) / not specified (Turion II N530). The Celeron G4900T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Turion II N530 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4900T rivals Pentium G5400T.