
Core i3-3210

Pro A8-8600B
Core i3-3210 vs Pro A8-8600B Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-3210 vs Pro A8-8600B FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-3210 vs Pro A8-8600B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-3210
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $33 less on MSRP ($117 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 29.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.1 vs 14.7 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 2500, while Pro A8-8600B needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Pro A8-8600B.
Trade-offs
- ❌2650% higher power demand at 55W vs 2W.
Pro A8-8600B
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 55W, a 53W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,203 vs 2,229).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 19.1 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-3210 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-3210.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-3210 better than Pro A8-8600B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-3210 vs Pro A8-8600B Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-3210
The Core i3-3210 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3072 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,229 points. Launch price was $120.

Pro A8-8600B
The Pro A8-8600B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,203 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i3-3210 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Pro A8-8600B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pro A8-8600B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-3210 versus 3 GHz on the Pro A8-8600B — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-3210 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core i3-3210 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pro A8-8600B uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3210 scores 2,229 against the Pro A8-8600B's 2,203 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i3-3210.
| Feature | Core i3-3210 | Pro A8-8600B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+7% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+100% | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3072 kB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 2048 kB+700% |
| Process | 22 nm-21% | 28 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Carrizo (2015−2018) |
| PassMark | 2,229+1% | 2,203 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 505 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,113 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-3210 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pro A8-8600B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-3210 | Pro A8-8600B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | FP4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Core i3-3210) / not specified (Pro A8-8600B). The Core i3-3210 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2500), while the Pro A8-8600B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3210 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-3210 rivals Ryzen 3 1200.
| Feature | Core i3-3210 | Pro A8-8600B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 2500 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-3210 was priced at $117, while the Pro A8-8600B came in at $150. On launch pricing ($117 vs $150), Core i3-3210 was $33 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-3210 delivers 19.1 pts/$ vs 14.7 pts/$ for the Pro A8-8600B — making the Core i3-3210 the 25.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-3210 | Pro A8-8600B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $117-22% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.1+30% | 14.7 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2015 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















