Core i3-3210 vs Phenom II X4 920

Intel

Core i3-3210

2 Cores4 Thrd55 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Phenom II X4 920

4 Cores4 Thrd125 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-3210 vs Phenom II X4 920 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-3210 vs Phenom II X4 920 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-3210 vs Phenom II X4 920: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-3210

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 2500, while Phenom II X4 920 needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Phenom II X4 920.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $117 MSRP, while Phenom II X4 920 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Phenom II X4 920

2009

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-3210 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (2,202 vs 2,229).
  • 127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-3210 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-3210.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-3210 better than Phenom II X4 920?
Yes. Core i3-3210 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i3-3210 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-3210 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-3210 is the better buy right now. Core i3-3210 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $117 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (19.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-3210 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-3210 vs Phenom II X4 920 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-3210

The Core i3-3210 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3072 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,229 points. Launch price was $120.

AMD

Phenom II X4 920

The Phenom II X4 920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,202 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Core i3-3210 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X4 920 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 920 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-3210 versus 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X4 920 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-3210 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i3-3210 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom II X4 920 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3210 scores 2,229 against the Phenom II X4 920's 2,202 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i3-3210. L3 cache: 3072 kB (total) on the Core i3-3210 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 920.

FeatureCore i3-3210Phenom II X4 920
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+14%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+14%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
3072 kB (total)
6 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark
2,229+1%
2,202
Geekbench 6 Single
505
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,113
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3210 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X4 920 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-3210Phenom II X4 920
Socket
LGA1155
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core i3-3210) / not specified (Phenom II X4 920). The Core i3-3210 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2500), while the Phenom II X4 920 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3210 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-3210 rivals Ryzen 3 1200.

FeatureCore i3-3210Phenom II X4 920
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 2500
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget