Core i3-4030U vs Ryzen 5 3600

Core i3-4030U vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-4030U

2 / 4

1,876

0.0%

17,685

+842.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4030U vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4030U vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4030U

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,876 vs 17,685).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +360.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+966.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Costs $82 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1231.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 6.7 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Core i3-4030U?

Yes. Ryzen 5 3600 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 360.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 842.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 3600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 360.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 3600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 842.7% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 966.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 3600 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 3600 comes in $82 cheaper on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 360.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1231.1% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 6.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 3600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014), 966.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4030U vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4030U

The Core i3-4030U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,876 points. Launch price was $281.

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4030U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Core i3-4030U versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 75.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i3-4030U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4030U scores 1,876 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 161.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-4030U vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i3-4030U	Ryzen 5 3600
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	6 / 12+200%
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz	4.2 GHz+121%
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	3.6 GHz+89%
L3 Cache	3 MB	32 MB (total)+967%
L2 Cache	512 kB	512K (per core)
Process	22 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-68%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark	1,876	17,685+843%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	9,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,295
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,898

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4030U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-4030U	Ryzen 5 3600
Socket	FCBGA1168	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	—	128 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-4030U) / Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

Feature	Core i3-4030U	Ryzen 5 3600
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	Yes
Target Use	—	Gaming/Budget Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-4030U was priced at $281, while the Ryzen 5 3600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($281 vs $199), Ryzen 5 3600 was $82 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4030U delivers 6.7 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 172.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-4030U	Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP	$281	$199-29%
Performance per Dollar	6.7	88.9+1227%
Release Date	2014	2019

Search Core i3-4030U on Amazon

Search Ryzen 5 3600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.