Core i3-4110M vs Xeon E5-2407

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4110M vs Xeon E5-2407 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4110M vs Xeon E5-2407: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4110M

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Xeon E5-2407 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2407, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌540% higher power demand at 512W vs 80W.

Xeon E5-2407

2012

Why buy it

✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
✅Draws 80W instead of 512W, a 432W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,659 vs 2,678).
❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Core i3-4110M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4110M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4110M better than Xeon E5-2407?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2407 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-4110M is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4110M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4110M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4110M is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2407 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i3-4110M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2407 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4110M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4110M vs Xeon E5-2407 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4110M

The Core i3-4110M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,678 points. Launch price was $225.

Xeon E5-2407

The Xeon E5-2407 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,659 points. Launch price was $335.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4110M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2407 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-2407 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core i3-4110M versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2407 — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-4110M (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i3-4110M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2407 uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4110M scores 2,678 against the Xeon E5-2407's 2,659 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-4110M. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-4110M vs 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2407.

Feature	Core i3-4110M	Xeon E5-2407
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+18%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+18%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	10240 kB (total)+233%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
PassMark	2,678	2,659

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4110M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2407 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-4110M	Xeon E5-2407
Socket	PGA946	LGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4110M) / not specified (Xeon E5-2407). The Core i3-4110M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon E5-2407 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4110M targets Mobile.