PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4150 vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4150 vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4150

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 54W instead of 65W, a 11W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4400, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,406 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.1 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1150, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +178.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+566.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Costs $85 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Delivers 953.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 12.1 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1150 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌20.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 54W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4150 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i3-4150?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 178.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 634.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 178.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 634.9% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 566.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in $85 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 178.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 953.5% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 12.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2014), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1150, 566.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i3-4150 vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4150

The Core i3-4150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,406 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4150 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-4150 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 27.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i3-4150 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4150 scores 3,406 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 152.1% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,071 vs 2,407, a 76.8% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4150 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

Feature	Core i3-4150	Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	10 / 16+400%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	4.6 GHz+31%
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+40%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+567%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+20380%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	22 nm	Intel 7 nm-68%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	3,406	25,029+635%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,211
Geekbench 6 Single	1,071	2,407+125%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,408

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4150 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4150 versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-4150) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4150) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

Feature	Core i3-4150	Core i5-13400F
Socket	LGA1150	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+200%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	192 GB+500%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4150) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The Core i3-4150 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4150 targets Budget Desktop, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i3-4150 rivals FX-6300; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i3-4150	Core i5-13400F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4400	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Budget Desktop	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-4150 was priced at $281, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($281 vs $196), Core i5-13400F was $85 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4150 delivers 12.1 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 165.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-4150	Core i5-13400F
MSRP	$281	$196-30%
Performance per Dollar	12.1	127.7+955%
Release Date	2014	2023

Search Core i3-4150 on Amazon

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.