Core i3-4150 vs Xeon E5-4603

Intel

Core i3-4150

2 Cores4 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-4603

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 2 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-4150 vs Xeon E5-4603 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4150 vs Xeon E5-4603 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4150 vs Xeon E5-4603: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4150

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 54W instead of 95W, a 41W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4400, while Xeon E5-4603 needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-4603.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 10 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4603, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.1 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $202 MSRP).

Xeon E5-4603

2012

Why buy it

  • +233.3% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 3 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
  • Costs $79 less on MSRP ($202 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
  • Delivers 38.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.8 vs 12.1 PassMark/$ ($202 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,391 vs 3,406).
  • 75.9% higher power demand at 95W vs 54W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4150 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4150.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4150 better than Xeon E5-4603?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4603 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-4150 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4150 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4150 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-4150 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-4603 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i3-4150 comes in 39.1% more expensive on MSRP at $281 MSRP versus $202 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-4603 is also 38.5% better value on MSRP (16.8 vs 12.1 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-4150 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4150 vs Xeon E5-4603 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-4150

The Core i3-4150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,406 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon E5-4603

The Xeon E5-4603 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,391 points. Launch price was $712.

Processing Power

The Core i3-4150 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-4603 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-4603 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-4150 versus 2 GHz on the Xeon E5-4603 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-4150 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i3-4150 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-4603 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4150 scores 3,406 against the Xeon E5-4603's 3,391 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-4150. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4150 vs 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-4603.

FeatureCore i3-4150Xeon E5-4603
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+75%
2 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+75%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
10240 kB (total)+233%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark
3,406
3,391
Geekbench 6 Single
1,071
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4150 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4603 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-4150Xeon E5-4603
Socket
LGA1150
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4150) / not specified (Xeon E5-4603). The Core i3-4150 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Xeon E5-4603 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4150 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-4150 rivals FX-6300.

FeatureCore i3-4150Xeon E5-4603
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4400
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Budget Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-4150 was priced at $281, while the Xeon E5-4603 came in at $202. On launch pricing ($281 vs $202), Xeon E5-4603 was $79 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4150 delivers 12.1 pts/$ vs 16.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4603 — making the Xeon E5-4603 the 32.3% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-4150Xeon E5-4603
MSRP
$281
$202-28%
Performance per Dollar
12.1
16.8+39%
Release Date
2014
2012

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.