Core i3-4150 vs Xeon X5698

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4150 vs Xeon X5698 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4150 vs Xeon X5698: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4150

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 54W instead of 130W, a 76W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4400, while Xeon X5698 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon X5698.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,406 vs 3,447).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Xeon X5698 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X5698

2011

Why buy it

✅+300% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

❌140.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 54W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4150 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4150.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5698 better than Core i3-4150?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5698 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-4150 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5698 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5698 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X5698 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon X5698 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-4150 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (12.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4150 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-4150 vs Xeon X5698 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4150

The Core i3-4150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,406 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon X5698

The Xeon X5698 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,447 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-4150 and Xeon X5698 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-4150 versus 4.4 GHz on the Xeon X5698 — a 22.8% clock advantage for the Xeon X5698 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Core i3-4150 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon X5698 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4150 scores 3,406 against the Xeon X5698's 3,447 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon X5698. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4150 vs 12288 kB (total) on the Xeon X5698.

Feature	Core i3-4150	Xeon X5698
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	4.4 GHz+26%
Base Clock	3.5 GHz	4.4 GHz+26%
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	12288 kB (total)+300%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	3,406	3,447+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,071	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4150 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5698 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4150 versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5698 — the Core i3-4150 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i3-4150) vs 3 (Xeon X5698). Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4150) and Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5698).

Feature	Core i3-4150	Xeon X5698
Socket	LGA1150	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	3+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4150) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5698). The Core i3-4150 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Xeon X5698 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4150 targets Budget Desktop, Xeon X5698 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i3-4150 rivals FX-6300; Xeon X5698 rivals Core i7-980X.