Core i3-4150 vs Core i5-4340M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4150 vs Core i5-4340M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4150 vs Core i5-4340M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4150

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 54W instead of 512W, a 458W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4400, while Core i5-4340M needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-4340M.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Core i5-4340M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i5-4340M

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4150 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,380 vs 3,406).
❌848.1% higher power demand at 512W vs 54W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4150 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4150.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4150 better than Core i5-4340M?

Yes. Core i3-4150 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4150 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4150 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4150 is the better buy right now. Core i3-4150 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $281 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4150 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4150 vs Core i5-4340M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4150

The Core i3-4150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,406 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-4340M

The Core i5-4340M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,380 points. Launch price was $266.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-4150 and Core i5-4340M share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-4150 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-4340M — a 2.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-4340M (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). Both are built on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i3-4150 scores 3,406 against the Core i5-4340M's 3,380 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-4150. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4150 vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4340M.

Feature	Core i3-4150	Core i5-4340M
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	3.6 GHz+3%
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+21%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	3 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,406	3,380
Geekbench 6 Single	1,071	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4150 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4340M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-4150	Core i5-4340M
Socket	LGA1150	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4150) / not specified (Core i5-4340M). The Core i3-4150 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Core i5-4340M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4150 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-4150 rivals FX-6300.