PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4160T vs Core i3-4330T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4160T vs Core i3-4330T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4160T

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($117 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
✅Delivers 17.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.4 vs 22.5 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-4330T.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (900 vs 956).
❌Lower PassMark (3,087 vs 3,105).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).

Core i3-4330T

2013

Why buy it

✅+6.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.5 vs 26.4 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4160T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4330T better than Core i3-4160T?

Yes. Core i3-4330T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4330T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4330T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4330T is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-4330T comes in 17.9% more expensive on MSRP at $138 MSRP versus $117 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-4160T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 17.3% better value on paper (26.4 vs 22.5 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4160T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-4160T vs Core i3-4330T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4160T

The Core i3-4160T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,087 points. Launch price was $142.

Core i3-4330T

The Core i3-4330T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,105 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-4160T and Core i3-4330T share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i3-4160T versus 3 GHz on the Core i3-4330T — a 3.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-4160T (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). Both are built on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i3-4160T scores 3,087 against the Core i3-4330T's 3,105 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-4330T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 900 vs 956, a 6% lead for the Core i3-4330T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4160T vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4330T.

Feature	Core i3-4160T	Core i3-4330T
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+3%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+3%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,087	3,105
Geekbench 6 Single	900	956+6%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,847

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1150 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Core i3-4160T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4160T) and H81,B85,H87,H97,Z87,Z97 (Core i3-4330T).

Feature	Core i3-4160T	Core i3-4330T
Socket	LGA1150	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4160T) vs Yes (Core i3-4330T). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 4400 (Core i3-4160T) and Intel HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4330T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4160T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-4160T rivals A10-7800.

Feature	Core i3-4160T	Core i3-4330T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4400	Intel HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, EPT	Yes
Target Use	Low Power Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-4160T was priced at $117, while the Core i3-4330T came in at $138. On launch pricing ($117 vs $138), Core i3-4160T was $21 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4160T delivers 26.4 pts/$ vs 22.5 pts/$ for the Core i3-4330T — making the Core i3-4160T the 15.9% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-4160T	Core i3-4330T
MSRP	$117-15%	$138
Performance per Dollar	26.4+17%	22.5
Release Date	2014	2013

Search Core i3-4160T on Amazon

Search Core i3-4330T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.