A10-5757M vs Core i3-4160T
A10-5757M
Core i3-4160T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-5757M is positioned at rank 1072 and the Core i3-4160T is on rank 653, so the Core i3-4160T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10-5757M
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4160T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A10-5757M | Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($18) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A10-5757M | Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($18) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10-5757M and Core i3-4160T
A10-5757M
The A10-5757M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,084 points. Launch price was $130.
Core i3-4160T
The Core i3-4160T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,087 points. Launch price was $142.
Processing Power
The A10-5757M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4160T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-5757M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-5757M versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i3-4160T — a 12.1% clock advantage for the A10-5757M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The A10-5757M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-4160T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5757M scores 3,084 against the Core i3-4160T's 3,087 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-4160T. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5757M vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4160T.
| Feature | A10-5757M | Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+13% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.1 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Richland (2013−2014) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 3,084 | 3,087 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 900 |
Memory & Platform
The A10-5757M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4160T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A10-5757M versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4160T — the A10-5757M supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP2 (A10-5757M) and H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4160T).
| Feature | A10-5757M | Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP2 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600+53233% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 | 32 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A10-5757M) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4160T). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8650G (A10-5757M) and HD Graphics 4400 (Core i3-4160T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4160T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: A10-5757M rivals Core i3-3110M; Core i3-4160T rivals A10-7800.
| Feature | A10-5757M | Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8650G | HD Graphics 4400 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Low Power Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A10-5757M and Core i3-4160T
