A10-5757M vs Core i7-4578U

A10-5757M vs Core i7-4578U Performance Spectrum

A10-5757M

4 / 4

3,084

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-4578U

2 / 4

3,075

0.0%

Core 2 Duo T7200

Pentium G620T

Pentium P6200

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5757M vs Core i7-4578U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5757M vs Core i7-4578U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5757M

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8650G, while Core i7-4578U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i7-4578U

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-5757M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,075 vs 3,084).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-5757M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-5757M better than Core i7-4578U?

Yes. A10-5757M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-5757M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-5757M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-5757M still makes the most sense overall. A10-5757M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4578U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-5757M vs Core i7-4578U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5757M

The A10-5757M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,084 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i7-4578U

The Core i7-4578U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,075 points. Launch price was $426.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5757M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-4578U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-5757M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-5757M versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-4578U — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The A10-5757M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-4578U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5757M scores 3,084 against the Core i7-4578U's 3,075 — a 0.3% lead for the A10-5757M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5757M vs 4 MB on the Core i7-4578U.

Feature	A10-5757M	Core i7-4578U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,084	3,075

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5757M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4578U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-5757M	Core i7-4578U
Socket	FP2	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A10-5757M) / not specified (Core i7-4578U). The A10-5757M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8650G), while the Core i7-4578U requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A10-5757M rivals Core i3-3110M.