A10-5757M vs Xeon W3530

A10-5757M vs Xeon W3530 Performance Spectrum

A10-5757M

4 / 4

3,084

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon W3530

4 / 8

3,059

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5757M vs Xeon W3530 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5757M vs Xeon W3530: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5757M

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8650G, while Xeon W3530 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W3530 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W3530, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon W3530

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,059 vs 3,084).
❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while A10-5757M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-5757M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-5757M better than Xeon W3530?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W3530 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A10-5757M is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-5757M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-5757M is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W3530 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. A10-5757M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon W3530 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W3530 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-5757M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-5757M vs Xeon W3530 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5757M

The A10-5757M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,084 points. Launch price was $130.

Xeon W3530

The Xeon W3530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.06 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,059 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5757M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon W3530's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-5757M versus 3.06 GHz on the Xeon W3530 — a 13.4% clock advantage for the A10-5757M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A10-5757M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon W3530 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5757M scores 3,084 against the Xeon W3530's 3,059 — a 0.8% lead for the A10-5757M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5757M vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3530.

Feature	A10-5757M	Xeon W3530
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+14%	3.06 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.8 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	0 kB	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark	3,084	3,059

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5757M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3530 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-5757M	Xeon W3530
Socket	FP2	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A10-5757M) / not specified (Xeon W3530). The A10-5757M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8650G), while the Xeon W3530 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A10-5757M rivals Core i3-3110M.