A10-5757M vs Core i5-6198DU

A10-5757M vs Core i5-6198DU Performance Spectrum

A10-5757M

4 / 4

3,084

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-6198DU

2 / 4

3,109

+0.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5757M vs Core i5-6198DU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5757M vs Core i5-6198DU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5757M

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,084 vs 3,109).

Core i5-6198DU

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-5757M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-6198DU better than A10-5757M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-5757M is ahead with a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6198DU pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6198DU is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-6198DU still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-6198DU comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-6198DU makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-5757M vs Core i5-6198DU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5757M

The A10-5757M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,084 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i5-6198DU

The Core i5-6198DU is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 December 2015 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,109 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5757M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-6198DU offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-5757M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-5757M versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i5-6198DU — a 22.2% clock advantage for the A10-5757M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The A10-5757M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-6198DU uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5757M scores 3,084 against the Core i5-6198DU's 3,109 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-6198DU. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5757M vs 3 MB on the Core i5-6198DU.

Feature	A10-5757M	Core i5-6198DU
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+25%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+9%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	3,084	3,109
Geekbench 6 Single	—	946

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5757M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-6198DU uses BGA (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A10-5757M versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-6198DU — the Core i5-6198DU supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-5757M) vs 12 (Core i5-6198DU) — the A10-5757M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP2 (A10-5757M) and Integrated (Core i5-6198DU).

Feature	A10-5757M	Core i5-6198DU
Socket	FP2	BGA
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A10-5757M) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-6198DU). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8650G (A10-5757M) and HD Graphics 510 (Core i5-6198DU) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6198DU targets Entry Level Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-5757M rivals Core i3-3110M; Core i5-6198DU rivals A9-9410.