Core i3-4160T vs Core i5-6360U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4160T vs Core i5-6360U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4160T vs Core i5-6360U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4160T

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4400, while Core i5-6360U needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-6360U.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,087 vs 3,112).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $117 MSRP, while Core i5-6360U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i5-6360U

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4160T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4160T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4160T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4160T better than Core i5-6360U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-4160T is ahead with a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6360U pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Core i5-6360U also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6360U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4160T is the better buy right now. Core i3-4160T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $117 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-6360U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (26.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-6360U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4160T vs Core i5-6360U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4160T

The Core i3-4160T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,087 points. Launch price was $142.

Core i5-6360U

The Core i5-6360U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,112 points. Launch price was $304.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-4160T and Core i5-6360U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i3-4160T versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-6360U — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i3-4160T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-6360U uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4160T scores 3,087 against the Core i5-6360U's 3,112 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-6360U. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4160T vs 4 MB on the Core i5-6360U.

Feature	Core i3-4160T	Core i5-6360U
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+55%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	4 MB+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	3,087	3,112
Geekbench 6 Single	900	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4160T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-6360U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-4160T	Core i5-6360U
Socket	LGA1150	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4160T) / not specified (Core i5-6360U). The Core i3-4160T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Core i5-6360U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4160T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-4160T rivals A10-7800.