Core i3-4350T vs A10-7700K
Core i3-4350T
A10-7700K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-4350T is positioned at rank 732 and the A10-7700K is on rank 402, so the A10-7700K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4350T
Performance Per Dollar A10-7700K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-4350T | A10-7700K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($152) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Godaveri (2014−2016) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-4350T | A10-7700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+650%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($152) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-4350T and A10-7700K
Core i3-4350T
The Core i3-4350T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,142 points. Launch price was $138.
A10-7700K
The A10-7700K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,182 points. Launch price was $152.
Processing Power
The Core i3-4350T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A10-7700K offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A10-7700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i3-4350T versus 3.8 GHz on the A10-7700K — a 20.3% clock advantage for the A10-7700K (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i3-4350T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the A10-7700K uses Godaveri (2014−2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4350T scores 3,142 against the A10-7700K's 3,182 — a 1.3% lead for the A10-7700K. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4350T vs 0 kB on the A10-7700K.
| Feature | Core i3-4350T | A10-7700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.8 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz+13% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 4096 kB+1500% |
| Process | 22 nm-21% | 28 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Godaveri (2014−2016) |
| PassMark | 3,142 | 3,182+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 442 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4350T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A10-7700K uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core i3-4350T | A10-7700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | FM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR3-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the A10-7700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4350T) vs AMD-V (A10-7700K). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4350T) and Radeon R7 (A10-7700K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4350T targets Desktop, A10-7700K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-7700K rivals Core i3-4360.
| Feature | Core i3-4350T | A10-7700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | Radeon R7 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-4350T launched at $138 MSRP, while the A10-7700K debuted at $152.
| Feature | Core i3-4350T | A10-7700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $138-9% | $152 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | — |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-4350T and A10-7700K
