Core i3-4350T vs FX-4170

Intel

Core i3-4350T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

FX-4170

4 Cores4 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-4350T vs FX-4170 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4350T vs FX-4170 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4350T vs FX-4170: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4350T

2014

Why buy it

  • +0.7% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $19 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $157 MSRP).
  • Delivers 14.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.8 vs 19.9 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $157 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

FX-4170

2012

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,121 vs 3,142).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.9 vs 22.8 PassMark/$ ($157 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
  • 257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4350T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4350T better than FX-4170?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-4170 is ahead with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4350T pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. FX-4170 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4350T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-4350T is the better buy right now. Core i3-4350T comes in $19 cheaper on MSRP at $138 MSRP versus $157 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that FX-4170 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 14.5% better value on MSRP (22.8 vs 19.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-4350T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4350T vs FX-4170 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-4350T

The Core i3-4350T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,142 points. Launch price was $138.

AMD

FX-4170

The FX-4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 February 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,121 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i3-4350T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-4170 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4170 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i3-4350T versus 4.3 GHz on the FX-4170 — a 32.4% clock advantage for the FX-4170 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i3-4350T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-4170 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4350T scores 3,142 against the FX-4170's 3,121 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-4350T. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4350T vs 8192 kB on the FX-4170.

FeatureCore i3-4350TFX-4170
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
4.3 GHz+39%
Base Clock
3.1 GHz
4.2 GHz+35%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
8192 kB+100%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
4096 kB+1500%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark
3,142
3,121
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4350T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4170 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-4350TFX-4170
Socket
LGA1150
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4350T) / not specified (FX-4170). The Core i3-4350T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the FX-4170 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4350T targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i3-4350TFX-4170
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-4350T was priced at $138, while the FX-4170 came in at $157. On launch pricing ($138 vs $157), Core i3-4350T was $19 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4350T delivers 22.8 pts/$ vs 19.9 pts/$ for the FX-4170 — making the Core i3-4350T the 13.5% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-4350TFX-4170
MSRP
$138-12%
$157
Performance per Dollar
22.8+15%
19.9
Release Date
2014
2012

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.