
Core i3-4350T

FX-4320
Core i3-4350T vs FX-4320 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-4350T vs FX-4320 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-4350T vs FX-4320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-4350T
2014Why buy it
- β Costs $112 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- β Delivers 80.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.8 vs 12.6 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- β Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while FX-4320 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (3,142 vs 3,150).
FX-4320
2012Why buy it
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 22.8 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
- β171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i3-4350T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is FX-4320 better than Core i3-4350T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-4350T vs FX-4320 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4350T
The Core i3-4350T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013β2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,142 points. Launch price was $138.

FX-4320
The FX-4320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012β2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4096 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 3,150 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i3-4350T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-4320 offers 4 cores / 4 threads β the FX-4320 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i3-4350T versus 4.1 GHz on the FX-4320 β a 27.8% clock advantage for the FX-4320 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i3-4350T uses the Haswell (2013β2015) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-4320 uses Vishera (2012β2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4350T scores 3,142 against the FX-4320's 3,150 β a 0.3% lead for the FX-4320. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4350T vs 4096 kB on the FX-4320.
| Feature | Core i3-4350T | FX-4320 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 4.1 GHz+32% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 4 GHz+29% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 4096 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 4096 kB+1500% |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013β2015) | Vishera (2012β2015) |
| PassMark | 3,142 | 3,150 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4350T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4320 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-4350T | FX-4320 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4350T) / not specified (FX-4320). The Core i3-4350T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the FX-4320 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4350T targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i3-4350T | FX-4320 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
| Target Use | Desktop | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-4350T was priced at $138, while the FX-4320 came in at $250. On launch pricing ($138 vs $250), Core i3-4350T was $112 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4350T delivers 22.8 pts/$ vs 12.6 pts/$ for the FX-4320 β making the Core i3-4350T the 57.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-4350T | FX-4320 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $138-45% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.8+81% | 12.6 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















