Core i3-4350T vs FX-4320

Intel

Core i3-4350T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2014
VS
AMD

FX-4320

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2012

Core i3-4350T vs FX-4320 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4350T vs FX-4320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4350T vs FX-4320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4350T

2014

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $112 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 80.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.8 vs 12.6 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
  • βœ…100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • βœ…Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while FX-4320 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (3,142 vs 3,150).

FX-4320

2012

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 22.8 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
    • ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
    • ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4350T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is FX-4320 better than Core i3-4350T?
    Yes. FX-4320 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, FX-4320 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-4320 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    FX-4320 is still the much better call for a fresh build. FX-4320 comes in 81.2% more expensive on MSRP at $250 MSRP versus $138 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-4350T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 80.7% better value on paper (22.8 vs 12.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i3-4350T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Core i3-4350T vs FX-4320 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core i3-4350T

    The Core i3-4350T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013βˆ’2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,142 points. Launch price was $138.

    AMD

    FX-4320

    The FX-4320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012βˆ’2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4096 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 3,150 points. Launch price was $69.

    ⚑

    Processing Power

    The Core i3-4350T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-4320 offers 4 cores / 4 threads β€” the FX-4320 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i3-4350T versus 4.1 GHz on the FX-4320 β€” a 27.8% clock advantage for the FX-4320 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i3-4350T uses the Haswell (2013βˆ’2015) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-4320 uses Vishera (2012βˆ’2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4350T scores 3,142 against the FX-4320's 3,150 β€” a 0.3% lead for the FX-4320. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4350T vs 4096 kB on the FX-4320.

    FeatureCore i3-4350TFX-4320
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 4
    4 / 4+100%
    Boost Clock
    3.1 GHz
    4.1 GHz+32%
    Base Clock
    3.1 GHz
    4 GHz+29%
    L3 Cache
    4 MB (total)
    4096 kB
    L2 Cache
    256 kB (per core)
    4096 kB+1500%
    Process
    22 nm-31%
    32 nm
    Architecture
    Haswell (2013βˆ’2015)
    Vishera (2012βˆ’2015)
    PassMark
    3,142
    3,150
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i3-4350T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4320 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i3-4350TFX-4320
    Socket
    LGA1150
    AM3+
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0+50%
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1600
    β€”
    Max RAM Capacity
    32 GB
    β€”
    RAM Channels
    2
    β€”
    ECC Support
    No
    β€”
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    β€”
    πŸ”§

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4350T) / not specified (FX-4320). The Core i3-4350T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the FX-4320 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4350T targets Desktop.

    FeatureCore i3-4350TFX-4320
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    β€”
    IGPU Model
    HD Graphics 4600
    β€”
    Unlocked
    No
    β€”
    AVX-512
    No
    β€”
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    β€”
    Target Use
    Desktop
    β€”
    πŸ’°

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Core i3-4350T was priced at $138, while the FX-4320 came in at $250. On launch pricing ($138 vs $250), Core i3-4350T was $112 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4350T delivers 22.8 pts/$ vs 12.6 pts/$ for the FX-4320 β€” making the Core i3-4350T the 57.5% better value option.

    FeatureCore i3-4350TFX-4320
    MSRP
    $138-45%
    $250
    Performance per Dollar
    22.8+81%
    12.6
    Release Date
    2014
    2012

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.