Core i3-4350T vs FX-4320
Core i3-4350T
FX-4320
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-4350T is positioned at rank 732 and the FX-4320 is on rank 950, so the Core i3-4350T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4350T
Performance Per Dollar FX-4320
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-4350T | FX-4320 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($100) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-4350T | FX-4320 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+399%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($100) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-4350T and FX-4320
Core i3-4350T
The Core i3-4350T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,142 points. Launch price was $138.
FX-4320
The FX-4320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4096 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 3,150 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i3-4350T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-4320 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4320 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i3-4350T versus 4.1 GHz on the FX-4320 — a 27.8% clock advantage for the FX-4320 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i3-4350T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-4320 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4350T scores 3,142 against the FX-4320's 3,150 — a 0.3% lead for the FX-4320. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4350T vs 4096 kB on the FX-4320.
| Feature | Core i3-4350T | FX-4320 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 4.1 GHz+32% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 4 GHz+29% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 4096 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 4096 kB+1500% |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| PassMark | 3,142 | 3,150 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4350T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4320 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-4350T | FX-4320 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4350T) / not specified (FX-4320). The Core i3-4350T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the FX-4320 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4350T targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i3-4350T | FX-4320 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-4350T launched at $138 MSRP, while the FX-4320 debuted at $250. At current prices ($20 vs $100), the Core i3-4350T is $80 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4350T delivers 157.1 pts/$ vs 31.5 pts/$ for the FX-4320 — making the Core i3-4350T the 133.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-4350T | FX-4320 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $138-45% | $250 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-80% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 157.1+399% | 31.5 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-4350T and FX-4320
