Core i3-4350T vs Core i7-875K
Core i3-4350T
Core i7-875K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-4350T is positioned at rank 732 and the Core i7-875K is on rank 1012, so the Core i3-4350T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4350T
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-875K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-4350T | Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($175) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-4350T | Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+765%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($175) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-4350T and Core i7-875K
Core i3-4350T
The Core i3-4350T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,142 points. Launch price was $138.
Core i7-875K
The Core i7-875K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,177 points. Launch price was $486.
Processing Power
The Core i3-4350T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-875K offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-875K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i3-4350T versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-875K — a 14.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-875K (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The Core i3-4350T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-875K uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4350T scores 3,142 against the Core i7-875K's 3,177 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-875K. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4350T vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-875K.
| Feature | Core i3-4350T | Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.6 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+6% | 2.93 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Lynnfield (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 3,142 | 3,177+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4350T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-875K uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Core i3-4350T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core i3-4350T | Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA1156 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+100% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-875K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4350T) vs VT-x (Core i7-875K). The Core i3-4350T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i7-875K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4350T targets Desktop, Core i7-875K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i3-4350T | Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x |
| Target Use | Desktop | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-4350T launched at $138 MSRP, while the Core i7-875K debuted at $353. At current prices ($20 vs $175), the Core i3-4350T is $155 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4350T delivers 157.1 pts/$ vs 18.2 pts/$ for the Core i7-875K — making the Core i3-4350T the 158.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-4350T | Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $138-61% | $353 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-89% | $175 |
| Performance per Dollar | 157.1+763% | 18.2 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-4350T and Core i7-875K
