Core i3-4350T vs Core i5-6360U

Intel

Core i3-4350T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-6360U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-4350T vs Core i5-6360U Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4350T vs Core i5-6360U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4350T vs Core i5-6360U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4350T

2014

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Core i5-6360U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while Core i5-6360U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i5-6360U

2015

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4350T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (3,112 vs 3,142).
    • 1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
    • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4350T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i3-4350T better than Core i5-6360U?
    Yes. Core i3-4350T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4350T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4350T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i3-4350T is the better buy right now. Core i3-4350T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $138 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (22.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i5-6360U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Core i3-4350T vs Core i5-6360U Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core i3-4350T

    The Core i3-4350T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,142 points. Launch price was $138.

    Intel

    Core i5-6360U

    The Core i5-6360U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,112 points. Launch price was $304.

    Processing Power

    Both the Core i3-4350T and Core i5-6360U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i3-4350T versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-6360U — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i3-4350T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-6360U uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4350T scores 3,142 against the Core i5-6360U's 3,112 — a 1% lead for the Core i3-4350T. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4350T vs 4 MB on the Core i5-6360U.

    FeatureCore i3-4350TCore i5-6360U
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 4
    2 / 4
    Boost Clock
    3.1 GHz
    3.1 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.1 GHz+55%
    2 GHz
    L3 Cache
    4 MB (total)
    4 MB
    L2 Cache
    256 kB (per core)
    512 kB+100%
    Process
    22 nm
    14 nm-36%
    Architecture
    Haswell (2013−2015)
    Skylake (2015−2016)
    PassMark
    3,142
    3,112
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i3-4350T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-6360U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i3-4350TCore i5-6360U
    Socket
    LGA1150
    BGA1356
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1600
    Max RAM Capacity
    32 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4350T) / not specified (Core i5-6360U). The Core i3-4350T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i5-6360U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4350T targets Desktop.

    FeatureCore i3-4350TCore i5-6360U
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    HD Graphics 4600
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    Target Use
    Desktop