
Core i3-5005U

Core i7-840QM
Core i3-5005U vs Core i7-840QM Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-5005U vs Core i7-840QM FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-5005U vs Core i7-840QM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-5005U
2015Why buy it
- ✅+16.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 5500, while Core i7-840QM needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-840QM across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌1037.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 45W.
Core i7-840QM
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 512W, a 467W reduction.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,050 vs 1,227).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-5005U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-840QM better than Core i3-5005U?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-5005U vs Core i7-840QM Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-5005U
The Core i3-5005U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,012 points. Launch price was $275.

Core i7-840QM
The Core i7-840QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,025 points. Launch price was $568.
Processing Power
The Core i3-5005U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-840QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-840QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i3-5005U versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-840QM — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-840QM (base: 2 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The Core i3-5005U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-840QM uses Clarksfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-5005U scores 2,012 against the Core i7-840QM's 2,025 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-840QM. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 617 vs 390, a 45.1% lead for the Core i3-5005U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,227 vs 1,050 (15.5% advantage for the Core i3-5005U). L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-5005U vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-840QM.
| Feature | Core i3-5005U | Core i7-840QM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 3.2 GHz+60% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz+8% | 1.86 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell-U (2015) | Clarksfield (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 2,012 | 2,025 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 617+58% | 390 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,227+17% | 1,050 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-5005U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-840QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-5005U versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-840QM — the Core i3-5005U supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-5005U supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i3-5005U) vs 16 (Core i7-840QM) — the Core i7-840QM offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Broadwell-U (Core i3-5005U) and PM55,HM55,QM57,HM57 (Core i7-840QM).
| Feature | Core i3-5005U | Core i7-840QM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1168 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600+20% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 16+33% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Core i3-5005U) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-840QM). The Core i3-5005U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 5500), while the Core i7-840QM requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-840QM targets Laptop.
| Feature | Core i3-5005U | Core i7-840QM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | — |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













