
Celeron G3930T

Core i3-5005U
Celeron G3930T vs Core i3-5005U Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G3930T vs Core i3-5005U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G3930T vs Core i3-5005U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G3930T
2017Why buy it
- ✅+14.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Core i3-5005U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Core i3-5005U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i3-5005U
2015Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (617 vs 704).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,227 vs 1,350).
- ❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G3930T.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G3930T better than Core i3-5005U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G3930T vs Core i3-5005U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3930T
The Celeron G3930T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,023 points. Launch price was $42.

Core i3-5005U
The Core i3-5005U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,012 points. Launch price was $275.
Processing Power
The Celeron G3930T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-5005U's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930T versus 2 GHz on the Core i3-5005U — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G3930T (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron G3930T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-5005U uses Broadwell-U (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930T scores 2,023 against the Core i3-5005U's 2,012 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G3930T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 704 vs 617, a 13.2% lead for the Celeron G3930T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,350 vs 1,227 (9.5% advantage for the Celeron G3930T). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G3930T vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-5005U.
| Feature | Celeron G3930T | Core i3-5005U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz+35% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+35% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 3 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Broadwell-U (2015) |
| PassMark | 2,023 | 2,012 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 704+14% | 617 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,350+10% | 1,227 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G3930T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-5005U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3930T versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-5005U — the Celeron G3930T supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3930T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G3930T) vs 12 (Core i3-5005U) — the Celeron G3930T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930T) and Intel Broadwell-U (Core i3-5005U).
| Feature | Celeron G3930T | Core i3-5005U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FCBGA1168 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+50% | DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+300% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+33% | 12 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3930T) vs true (Core i3-5005U). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 610 (Celeron G3930T) and Intel HD Graphics 5500 (Core i3-5005U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930T rivals Pentium G4560T.
| Feature | Celeron G3930T | Core i3-5005U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 610 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













