Celeron G3930T vs Core i3-5005U

Intel

Celeron G3930T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i3-5005U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······

Celeron G3930T vs Core i3-5005U Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3930T vs Core i3-5005U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3930T vs Core i3-5005U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3930T

2017

Why buy it

  • +14.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
  • Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
  • 33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Core i3-5005U.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Core i3-5005U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i3-5005U

2015

Why buy it

  • +50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (617 vs 704).
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,227 vs 1,350).
  • 1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G3930T.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3930T better than Core i3-5005U?
Yes. Celeron G3930T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 10% better Geekbench multi-core, 0.5% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Celeron G3930T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3930T is the stronger fit. You are getting 10% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron G3930T is the better buy right now. Celeron G3930T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (48.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G3930T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G3930T vs Core i3-5005U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G3930T

The Celeron G3930T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,023 points. Launch price was $42.

Intel

Core i3-5005U

The Core i3-5005U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,012 points. Launch price was $275.

Processing Power

The Celeron G3930T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-5005U's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930T versus 2 GHz on the Core i3-5005U — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G3930T (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron G3930T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-5005U uses Broadwell-U (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930T scores 2,023 against the Core i3-5005U's 2,012 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G3930T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 704 vs 617, a 13.2% lead for the Celeron G3930T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,350 vs 1,227 (9.5% advantage for the Celeron G3930T). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G3930T vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-5005U.

FeatureCeleron G3930TCore i3-5005U
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz+35%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+35%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Broadwell-U (2015)
PassMark
2,023
2,012
Geekbench 6 Single
704+14%
617
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,350+10%
1,227
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3930T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-5005U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3930T versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-5005U — the Celeron G3930T supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3930T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G3930T) vs 12 (Core i3-5005U) — the Celeron G3930T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930T) and Intel Broadwell-U (Core i3-5005U).

FeatureCeleron G3930TCore i3-5005U
Socket
LGA1151
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+50%
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+300%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3930T) vs true (Core i3-5005U). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 610 (Celeron G3930T) and Intel HD Graphics 5500 (Core i3-5005U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930T rivals Pentium G4560T.

FeatureCeleron G3930TCore i3-5005U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 610
Intel HD Graphics 5500
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
Target Use
Desktop