Celeron G3930T vs Core M-5Y51

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3930T vs Core M-5Y51 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3930T vs Core M-5Y51: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3930T

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $239 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Delivers 566.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 48.2 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 610, while Core M-5Y51 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,023 vs 2,030).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).

Core M-5Y51

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 48.2 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3930T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G3930T.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3930T better than Core M-5Y51?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G3930T is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core M-5Y51 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Core M-5Y51 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core M-5Y51 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3930T is the better buy right now. Celeron G3930T comes in $239 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core M-5Y51 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 566.7% better value on MSRP (48.2 vs 7.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3930T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G3930T vs Core M-5Y51 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3930T

The Celeron G3930T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,023 points. Launch price was $42.

Core M-5Y51

The Core M-5Y51 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 October 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,030 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G3930T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core M-5Y51's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930T versus 2.6 GHz on the Core M-5Y51 — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G3930T (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Celeron G3930T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core M-5Y51 uses Broadwell-Y (2014) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930T scores 2,023 against the Core M-5Y51's 2,030 — a 0.3% lead for the Core M-5Y51. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G3930T vs 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y51.

Feature	Celeron G3930T	Core M-5Y51
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+4%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+145%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	4 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Broadwell-Y (2014)
PassMark	2,023	2,030
Geekbench 6 Single	704	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,350	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3930T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core M-5Y51 uses FCBGA1234 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G3930T	Core M-5Y51
Socket	LGA1151	FCBGA1234
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3930T) / not specified (Core M-5Y51). The Celeron G3930T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 610), while the Core M-5Y51 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930T rivals Pentium G4560T.

Feature	Celeron G3930T	Core M-5Y51
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 610	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3930T was priced at $42, while the Core M-5Y51 came in at $281. On launch pricing ($42 vs $281), Celeron G3930T was $239 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3930T delivers 48.2 pts/$ vs 7.2 pts/$ for the Core M-5Y51 — making the Celeron G3930T the 147.8% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G3930T	Core M-5Y51
MSRP	$42-85%	$281
Performance per Dollar	48.2+569%	7.2
Release Date	2017	2014

Search Celeron G3930T on Amazon

Search Core M-5Y51 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.