
Celeron G3930T

Core i5-2430M
Celeron G3930T vs Core i5-2430M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G3930T vs Core i5-2430M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G3930T vs Core i5-2430M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G3930T
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $183 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 437.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 48.2 vs 9.0 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Core i5-2430M.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
Core i5-2430M
2011Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,015 vs 2,023).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 48.2 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G3930T.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G3930T better than Core i5-2430M?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G3930T vs Core i5-2430M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3930T
The Celeron G3930T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,023 points. Launch price was $42.

Core i5-2430M
The Core i5-2430M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,015 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The Celeron G3930T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-2430M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930T versus 3 GHz on the Core i5-2430M — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-2430M (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Celeron G3930T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-2430M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930T scores 2,023 against the Core i5-2430M's 2,015 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G3930T. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G3930T vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2430M.
| Feature | Celeron G3930T | Core i5-2430M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+13% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 3 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,023 | 2,015 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 704 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,350 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G3930T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-2430M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3930T versus 1333 on the Core i5-2430M — the Celeron G3930T supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3930T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930T) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i5-2430M).
| Feature | Celeron G3930T | Core i5-2430M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+80% | 1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+300% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3930T) vs true (Core i5-2430M). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 610 (Celeron G3930T) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i5-2430M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930T rivals Pentium G4560T; Core i5-2430M rivals AMD A8-3500M.
| Feature | Celeron G3930T | Core i5-2430M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 610 | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G3930T was priced at $42, while the Core i5-2430M came in at $225. On launch pricing ($42 vs $225), Celeron G3930T was $183 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3930T delivers 48.2 pts/$ vs 9.0 pts/$ for the Core i5-2430M — making the Celeron G3930T the 137.3% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G3930T | Core i5-2430M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-81% | $225 |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.2+436% | 9.0 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














