Celeron G3930T vs Phenom II X4 810

Celeron G3930T vs Phenom II X4 810 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G3930T

2 / 2

2,023

0.0%

2,036

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3930T vs Phenom II X4 810 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3930T vs Phenom II X4 810: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3930T

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $133 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $175 MSRP).
✅Delivers 314.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 48.2 vs 11.6 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $175 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 610, while Phenom II X4 810 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,023 vs 2,036).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).

Phenom II X4 810

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.6 vs 48.2 PassMark/$ ($175 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3930T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G3930T.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3930T better than Phenom II X4 810?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G3930T is ahead with a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 810 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. Phenom II X4 810 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 810 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3930T is the better buy right now. Celeron G3930T comes in $133 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $175 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Phenom II X4 810 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 314.0% better value on MSRP (48.2 vs 11.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3930T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G3930T vs Phenom II X4 810 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3930T

The Celeron G3930T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,023 points. Launch price was $42.

Phenom II X4 810

The Phenom II X4 810 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 February 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,036 points. Launch price was $116.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G3930T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X4 810 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 810 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930T versus 2.6 GHz on the Phenom II X4 810 — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G3930T (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron G3930T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X4 810 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930T scores 2,023 against the Phenom II X4 810's 2,036 — a 0.6% lead for the Phenom II X4 810. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G3930T vs 4 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 810.

Feature	Celeron G3930T	Phenom II X4 810
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+4%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+4%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	4 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark	2,023	2,036
Geekbench 6 Single	704	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,350	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3930T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X4 810 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G3930T	Phenom II X4 810
Socket	LGA1151	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3930T) / not specified (Phenom II X4 810). The Celeron G3930T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 610), while the Phenom II X4 810 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930T rivals Pentium G4560T.

Feature	Celeron G3930T	Phenom II X4 810
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 610	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3930T was priced at $42, while the Phenom II X4 810 came in at $175. On launch pricing ($42 vs $175), Celeron G3930T was $133 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3930T delivers 48.2 pts/$ vs 11.6 pts/$ for the Phenom II X4 810 — making the Celeron G3930T the 122.2% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G3930T	Phenom II X4 810
MSRP	$42-76%	$175
Performance per Dollar	48.2+316%	11.6
Release Date	2017	2009

Search Celeron G3930T on Amazon

Search Phenom II X4 810 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.