PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3900E vs Celeron G3930T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3900E vs Celeron G3930T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3900E

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (699 vs 704).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (948 vs 1,350).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.0 vs 48.2 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G3930T.

Celeron G3930T

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $65 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅Delivers 153.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 48.2 vs 19.0 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Celeron G3900E.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3930T better than Celeron G3900E?

Yes. Celeron G3930T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 42.4% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G3930T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3930T is the stronger fit. You are getting 42.4% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3930T is the better buy right now. Celeron G3930T comes in $65 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 153.4% better value on MSRP (48.2 vs 19.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3930T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G3900E vs Celeron G3930T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3900E

The Celeron G3900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,034 points. Launch price was $107.

Celeron G3930T

The Celeron G3930T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,023 points. Launch price was $42.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G3900E and Celeron G3930T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G3900E versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930T — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G3930T. The Celeron G3900E uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron G3930T uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3900E scores 2,034 against the Celeron G3930T's 2,023 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G3900E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 699 vs 704, a 0.7% lead for the Celeron G3930T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 948 vs 1,350 (35% advantage for the Celeron G3930T). L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3900E vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G3930T.

Feature	Celeron G3900E	Celeron G3930T
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	2.7 GHz+13%
Base Clock	—	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,034	2,023
Geekbench 6 Single	699	704
Geekbench 6 Multi	948	1,350+42%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900E versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3930T — the Celeron G3930T supports 12.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H110,B150,H170,Z170 (Celeron G3900E) and H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930T).

Feature	Celeron G3900E	Celeron G3930T
Socket	—	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	DDR4-2400+13%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G3900E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3930T). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 510 (Celeron G3900E) and Intel HD Graphics 610 (Celeron G3930T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900E targets Budget, Celeron G3930T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900E rivals Pentium G4400; Celeron G3930T rivals Pentium G4560T.

Feature	Celeron G3900E	Celeron G3930T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 510	Intel HD Graphics 610
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Budget	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3900E was priced at $107, while the Celeron G3930T came in at $42. On launch pricing ($107 vs $42), Celeron G3930T was $65 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3900E delivers 19.0 pts/$ vs 48.2 pts/$ for the Celeron G3930T — making the Celeron G3930T the 86.8% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G3900E	Celeron G3930T
MSRP	$107	$42-61%
Performance per Dollar	19.0	48.2+154%
Release Date	2016	2017

Search Celeron G3900E on Amazon

Search Celeron G3930T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.