Celeron G3930T vs Pentium Dual Core T3400

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3930T vs Pentium Dual Core T3400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3930T vs Pentium Dual Core T3400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3930T

2017

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 610, while Pentium Dual Core T3400 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Pentium Dual Core T3400.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,023 vs 2,026).
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Pentium Dual Core T3400 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Pentium Dual Core T3400

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3930T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G3930T.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3930T better than Pentium Dual Core T3400?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G3930T is ahead with a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual Core T3400 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual Core T3400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3930T is the better buy right now. Celeron G3930T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Pentium Dual Core T3400 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (48.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3930T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G3930T vs Pentium Dual Core T3400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3930T

The Celeron G3930T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,023 points. Launch price was $42.

Pentium Dual Core T3400

The Pentium Dual Core T3400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.16 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,026 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G3930T and Pentium Dual Core T3400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930T versus 2.16 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T3400 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Celeron G3930T. The Celeron G3930T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T3400 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930T scores 2,023 against the Pentium Dual Core T3400's 2,026 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium Dual Core T3400.

Feature	Celeron G3930T	Pentium Dual Core T3400
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+25%	2.16 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	2,023	2,026
Geekbench 6 Single	704	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,350	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3930T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Dual Core T3400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G3930T	Pentium Dual Core T3400
Socket	LGA1151	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3930T) / not specified (Pentium Dual Core T3400). The Celeron G3930T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 610), while the Pentium Dual Core T3400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930T rivals Pentium G4560T.

Feature	Celeron G3930T	Pentium Dual Core T3400
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 610	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3930T was priced at $42, while the Pentium Dual Core T3400 came in at $0. On launch pricing ($42 vs $0), Pentium Dual Core T3400 was $42 cheaper.

Feature	Celeron G3930T	Pentium Dual Core T3400
MSRP	$42	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	48.2	—
Release Date	2017	2008

Search Celeron G3930T on Amazon

Search Pentium Dual Core T3400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.