Celeron M 560 vs Core i3-5005U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 560 vs Core i3-5005U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 560 vs Core i3-5005U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 560

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,008 vs 2,012).
❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Core i3-5005U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-5005U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-5005U

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 5500, while Celeron M 560 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron M 560 better than Core i3-5005U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron M 560 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-5005U pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-5005U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron M 560 is the better buy right now. Celeron M 560 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $86 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i3-5005U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (23.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-5005U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron M 560 vs Core i3-5005U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M 560

The Celeron M 560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.13 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,008 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-5005U

The Core i3-5005U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,012 points. Launch price was $275.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M 560 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core i3-5005U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i3-5005U has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.13 GHz on the Celeron M 560 versus 2 GHz on the Core i3-5005U — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Celeron M 560. The Celeron M 560 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i3-5005U uses Broadwell-U (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 560 scores 2,008 against the Core i3-5005U's 2,012 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-5005U.

Feature	Celeron M 560	Core i3-5005U
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.13 GHz+6%	2 GHz
Base Clock	—	2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	65 nm	14 nm-78%
Architecture	Merom (2006−2008)	Broadwell-U (2015)
PassMark	2,008	2,012
Geekbench 6 Single	—	617
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,227

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 560 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-5005U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 667 on the Celeron M 560 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-5005U — the Core i3-5005U supports 139.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-5005U supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron M 560) vs 12 (Core i3-5005U) — the Core i3-5005U offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GL960,GM965 (Celeron M 560) and Intel Broadwell-U (Core i3-5005U).

Feature	Celeron M 560	Core i3-5005U
Socket	PGA478	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	667	DDR3L-1600+140%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	16 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: false (Celeron M 560) vs true (Core i3-5005U). The Core i3-5005U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 5500), while the Celeron M 560 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron M 560 rivals Mobile Sempron 3600+.