Celeron M 560 vs Phenom II X4 805

Celeron M 560 vs Phenom II X4 805 Performance Spectrum

Celeron M 560

1 / 1

2,008

+0.3%

2,001

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 560 vs Phenom II X4 805 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 560 vs Phenom II X4 805: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 560

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 95W, a 94W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Phenom II X4 805 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Phenom II X4 805

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,001 vs 2,008).
❌9400% higher power demand at 95W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron M 560 better than Phenom II X4 805?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Phenom II X4 805 is ahead with a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 560 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 560 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron M 560 is the better buy right now. Celeron M 560 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $86 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Phenom II X4 805 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (23.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Phenom II X4 805 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron M 560 vs Phenom II X4 805 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M 560

The Celeron M 560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.13 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,008 points. Launch price was $69.

Phenom II X4 805

The Phenom II X4 805 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 February 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,001 points. Launch price was $174.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M 560 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Phenom II X4 805 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 805 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.13 GHz on the Celeron M 560 versus 2.5 GHz on the Phenom II X4 805 — a 16% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 805. The Celeron M 560 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Phenom II X4 805 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 560 scores 2,008 against the Phenom II X4 805's 2,001 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron M 560.

Feature	Celeron M 560	Phenom II X4 805
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	4 / 4+300%
Boost Clock	2.13 GHz	2.5 GHz+17%
Base Clock	—	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
Architecture	Merom (2006−2008)	Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark	2,008	2,001

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 560 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Phenom II X4 805 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.