Celeron M 560 vs Core 2 Duo T5800

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 560 vs Core 2 Duo T5800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 560 vs Core 2 Duo T5800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 560

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 2W, a 1W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo T5800 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core 2 Duo T5800

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,000 vs 2,008).
❌100% higher power demand at 2W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron M 560 better than Core 2 Duo T5800?

Yes. Celeron M 560 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron M 560 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 560 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron M 560 is the better buy right now. Celeron M 560 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $86 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (23.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 2 Duo T5800 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Celeron M 560 vs Core 2 Duo T5800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M 560

The Celeron M 560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.13 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,008 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Duo T5800

The Core 2 Duo T5800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,000 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M 560 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T5800 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core 2 Duo T5800 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.13 GHz on the Celeron M 560 versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5800 — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Celeron M 560. Both are built on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture using a 65 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron M 560 scores 2,008 against the Core 2 Duo T5800's 2,000 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron M 560.

Feature	Celeron M 560	Core 2 Duo T5800
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	2.13 GHz+6%	2 GHz
Base Clock	—	2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Merom (2006−2008)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	2,008	2,000