PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 560 vs Core i3-4330TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 560 vs Core i3-4330TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 560

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $52 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
✅Delivers 59.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 14.7 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,008 vs 2,022).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4330TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-4330TE

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Celeron M 560 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 23.3 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4330TE better than Celeron M 560?

Yes. Core i3-4330TE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4330TE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4330TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4330TE is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-4330TE comes in 60.5% more expensive on MSRP at $138 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron M 560 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 59.4% better value on paper (23.3 vs 14.7 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4330TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron M 560 vs Core i3-4330TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M 560

The Celeron M 560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.13 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,008 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-4330TE

The Core i3-4330TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,022 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M 560 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core i3-4330TE offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i3-4330TE has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.13 GHz on the Celeron M 560 versus 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-4330TE — a 11.9% clock advantage for the Core i3-4330TE. The Celeron M 560 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i3-4330TE uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 560 scores 2,008 against the Core i3-4330TE's 2,022 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-4330TE.

Feature	Celeron M 560	Core i3-4330TE
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.13 GHz	2.4 GHz+13%
Base Clock	—	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	65 nm	22 nm-66%
Architecture	Merom (2006−2008)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,008	2,022
Geekbench 6 Single	—	650

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 560 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-4330TE uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 667 on the Celeron M 560 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4330TE — the Core i3-4330TE supports 139.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-4330TE supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron M 560) vs 16 (Core i3-4330TE) — the Core i3-4330TE offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GL960,GM965 (Celeron M 560) and H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97,C226 (Core i3-4330TE).

Feature	Celeron M 560	Core i3-4330TE
Socket	PGA478	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	667	DDR3-1600+140%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	32 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Celeron M 560) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4330TE). The Core i3-4330TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Celeron M 560 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4330TE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Celeron M 560 rivals Mobile Sempron 3600+; Core i3-4330TE rivals Embedded R-Series.

Feature	Celeron M 560	Core i3-4330TE
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	None	HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	false	VT-x, EPT
Target Use	—	Embedded

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron M 560 was priced at $86, while the Core i3-4330TE came in at $138. On launch pricing ($86 vs $138), Celeron M 560 was $52 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron M 560 delivers 23.3 pts/$ vs 14.7 pts/$ for the Core i3-4330TE — making the Celeron M 560 the 45.8% better value option.

Feature	Celeron M 560	Core i3-4330TE
MSRP	$86-38%	$138
Performance per Dollar	23.3+59%	14.7
Release Date	2008	2014

Search Celeron M 560 on Amazon

Search Core i3-4330TE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.