Core i3-6100TE vs PRO A12-9800E

Core i3-6100TE vs PRO A12-9800E Performance Spectrum

Core i3-6100TE

2 / 4

3,152

+0.8%

3,128

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-6100TE vs PRO A12-9800E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-6100TE vs PRO A12-9800E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-6100TE

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while PRO A12-9800E needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A12-9800E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while PRO A12-9800E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

PRO A12-9800E

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,128 vs 3,152).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-6100TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-6100TE better than PRO A12-9800E?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A12-9800E is ahead with a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6100TE pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6100TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-6100TE is the better buy right now. Core i3-6100TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $250 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that PRO A12-9800E is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, PRO A12-9800E can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A12-9800E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-6100TE vs PRO A12-9800E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-6100TE

The Core i3-6100TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,152 points. Launch price was $117.

PRO A12-9800E

The PRO A12-9800E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,128 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-6100TE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the PRO A12-9800E offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the PRO A12-9800E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i3-6100TE versus 3.8 GHz on the PRO A12-9800E — a 33.8% clock advantage for the PRO A12-9800E. The Core i3-6100TE uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the PRO A12-9800E uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-6100TE scores 3,152 against the PRO A12-9800E's 3,128 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-6100TE.

Feature	Core i3-6100TE	PRO A12-9800E
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	3.8 GHz+41%
Base Clock	—	3.1 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	2048 kB+300%
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	3,152	3,128

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-6100TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A12-9800E uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-6100TE	PRO A12-9800E
Socket	LGA1151	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-6100TE) / not specified (PRO A12-9800E). The Core i3-6100TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the PRO A12-9800E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-6100TE targets Embedded.