Core i3-7102E vs Celeron G5920
Core i3-7102E
Celeron G5920
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i3-7102E is positioned at rank #974 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7102E
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G5920
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-7102E | Celeron G5920 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($80) | ✅ More affordable ($40) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-7102E | Celeron G5920 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+98%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($80) | ✅ More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-7102E and Celeron G5920
Core i3-7102E
The Core i3-7102E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,599 points. Launch price was $225.
Celeron G5920
The Celeron G5920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,577 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i3-7102E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G5920's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Core i3-7102E versus 3.5 GHz on the Celeron G5920 — a 50% clock advantage for the Celeron G5920. The Core i3-7102E uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron G5920 uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7102E scores 2,599 against the Celeron G5920's 2,577 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-7102E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,962 vs 756, a 88.7% lead for the Core i3-7102E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 1,248 (41.3% advantage for the Core i3-7102E). L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-7102E vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G5920.
| Feature | Core i3-7102E | Celeron G5920 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz+67% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 2,599 | 2,577 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 659 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962+160% | 756 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898+52% | 1,248 |
Memory & Platform
Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. The Celeron G5920 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 100 Series,Intel 200 Series (Core i3-7102E) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5920).
| Feature | Core i3-7102E | Celeron G5920 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | — | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: Yes (Core i3-7102E) vs VT-x (Celeron G5920). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7102E) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5920) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5920 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5920 rivals Pentium Gold G6405.
| Feature | Core i3-7102E | Celeron G5920 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 610 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-7102E launched at $225 MSRP, while the Celeron G5920 debuted at $52. At current prices ($80 vs $40), the Celeron G5920 is $40 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-7102E delivers 32.5 pts/$ vs 64.4 pts/$ for the Celeron G5920 — making the Celeron G5920 the 65.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-7102E | Celeron G5920 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $225 | $52-77% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | $40-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.5 | 64.4+98% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-7102E and Celeron G5920
