Core i3-7130U vs Core i7-7567U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-7130U vs Core i7-7567U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-7130U vs Core i7-7567U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-7130U

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 28W, a 13W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 620, while Core i7-7567U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7567U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,055 vs 4,095).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).

Core i7-7567U

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

❌86.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-7130U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7567U better than Core i3-7130U?

Yes. Core i7-7567U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-7567U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7567U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-7567U still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-7567U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-7567U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-7130U vs Core i7-7567U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-7130U

The Core i3-7130U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,055 points. Launch price was $281.

Core i7-7567U

The Core i7-7567U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,095 points. Launch price was $415.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-7130U and Core i7-7567U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i3-7130U versus 4 GHz on the Core i7-7567U — a 38.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-7567U (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i3-7130U uses the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-7567U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7130U scores 4,055 against the Core i7-7567U's 4,095 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-7567U. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-7130U vs 4 MB on the Core i7-7567U.

Feature	Core i3-7130U	Core i7-7567U
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	4 GHz+48%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3.5 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	3 MB	4 MB+33%
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake-U (2017)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	4,055	4,095
Geekbench 6 Single	900	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the BGA1356 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Core i3-7130U	Core i7-7567U
Socket	BGA1356	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7130U) / not specified (Core i7-7567U). The Core i3-7130U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 620), while the Core i7-7567U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7130U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-7130U rivals Ryzen 3 3250U.