Core i3-7300T vs Core i3-1110G4

Both the Core i3-7300T and Core i3-1110G4 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-7300T versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1110G4 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-1110G4 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i3-7300T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-1110G4 uses Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Core i3-7300T scores 4,145 against the Core i3-1110G4's 4,160 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-1110G4. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,100 vs 1,491, a 30.2% lead for the Core i3-1110G4 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-7300T vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1110G4.

The Core i3-7300T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-1110G4 uses FCBGA1598 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. The Core i3-7300T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-7300T) vs 4 (Core i3-1110G4) — the Core i3-7300T offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i3-1110G4 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7300T) and UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU) (Core i3-1110G4) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7300T targets Low Power Desktop, Core i3-1110G4 targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-7300T rivals Ryzen 3 2200GE; Core i3-1110G4 rivals Ryzen 3 4300U.