Core i3-7300T vs FX-6200

Core i3-7300T vs FX-6200 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-7300T

2 / 4

4,145

+0.8%

4,114

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-7300T vs FX-6200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-7300T vs FX-6200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-7300T

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $31 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Delivers 23.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.0 vs 24.3 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

FX-6200

2012

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,114 vs 4,145).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.3 vs 30.0 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-7300T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-7300T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-7300T better than FX-6200?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-6200 is ahead with a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7300T pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. FX-6200 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7300T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-7300T is the better buy right now. Core i3-7300T comes in $31 cheaper on MSRP at $138 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that FX-6200 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 23.4% better value on MSRP (30.0 vs 24.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-7300T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 6/6. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-7300T vs FX-6200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-7300T

The Core i3-7300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,145 points. Launch price was $147.

FX-6200

The FX-6200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 February 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,114 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-7300T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-6200 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6200 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-7300T versus 4.1 GHz on the FX-6200 — a 15.8% clock advantage for the FX-6200 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i3-7300T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-6200 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7300T scores 4,145 against the FX-6200's 4,114 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-7300T. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-7300T vs 8192 kB on the FX-6200.

Feature	Core i3-7300T	FX-6200
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	4.1 GHz+17%
Base Clock	3.5 GHz	3.8 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8192 kB+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	6144 kB+2300%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark	4,145	4,114
Geekbench 6 Single	1,100	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-7300T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-6200 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-7300T	FX-6200
Socket	LGA1151	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7300T) / not specified (FX-6200). The Core i3-7300T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the FX-6200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7300T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-7300T rivals Ryzen 3 2200GE.

Feature	Core i3-7300T	FX-6200
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Low Power Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-7300T was priced at $138, while the FX-6200 came in at $169. On launch pricing ($138 vs $169), Core i3-7300T was $31 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-7300T delivers 30.0 pts/$ vs 24.3 pts/$ for the FX-6200 — making the Core i3-7300T the 20.9% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-7300T	FX-6200
MSRP	$138-18%	$169
Performance per Dollar	30.0+23%	24.3
Release Date	2017	2012

Search Core i3-7300T on Amazon

Search FX-6200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.