Core i3-7300T vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

Core i3-7300T vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T Performance Spectrum

Core i3-7300T

2 / 4

4,145

+0.5%

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

8 / 8

4,125

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-7300T vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-7300T vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-7300T

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while MediaTek Kompanio 1300T needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike MediaTek Kompanio 1300T.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than MediaTek Kompanio 1300T across 13 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while MediaTek Kompanio 1300T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.3% higher average FPS across 13 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,125 vs 4,145).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-7300T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-7300T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-7300T better than MediaTek Kompanio 1300T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is ahead with a 18.3% average FPS lead across 13 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7300T pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7300T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-7300T is the better buy right now. Core i3-7300T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $138 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 18.3% average FPS lead across 13 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (30.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-7300T vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-7300T

The Core i3-7300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,145 points. Launch price was $147.

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

The MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in 9 March 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. Built on 6 nm process technology. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,125 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-7300T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-7300T versus 2.6 GHz on the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T — a 29.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-7300T (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i3-7300T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T uses Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7300T scores 4,145 against the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T's 4,125 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-7300T.

Feature	Core i3-7300T	MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	8 / 8+300%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+35%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+75%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	6 nm-57%
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024)
PassMark	4,145	4,125
Geekbench 6 Single	1,100	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7300T) / not specified (MediaTek Kompanio 1300T). The Core i3-7300T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7300T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-7300T rivals Ryzen 3 2200GE.