Core i3-8130U
VS
A10-9700

Core i3-8130U vs A10-9700

Intel

Core i3-8130U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2018
VS
AMD

A10-9700

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-8130U is positioned at rank 1024 and the A10-9700 is on rank 771, so the A10-9700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-8130U

#1012
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2342%
#1013
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2307%
#1014
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2118%
#1015
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2109%
#1016
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2089%
#1018
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2018%
#1019
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1935%
#1020
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1931%
#1021
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1879%
#1024
Core i3-8130U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
100%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
99%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
98%
#1032
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
98%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
96%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
95%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
93%
#1039
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A10-9700

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14815%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13999%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10164%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3062%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2426%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2122%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1215%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1199%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1092%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1092%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1080%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1051%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1036%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1032%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1022%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
99%
#771
A10-9700
MSRP: $169|Avg: $40
100%
#772
Core i5-2400
MSRP: $184|Avg: $25
100%
#773
Core i7-5775C
MSRP: $366|Avg: $150
100%
#775
Pentium G2140
MSRP: $100|Avg: $95
99%
#776
Core i7-4790T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $102
99%
#777
Core i5-2320
MSRP: $177|Avg: $22
99%
#778
Celeron E3500
MSRP: $62|Avg: $10
99%
#779
Pentium G2030
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
99%
#780
Athlon II X2 260
MSRP: $60|Avg: $12
99%
#781
Athlon II X3 445
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#783
Core i5-2310
MSRP: $177|Avg: $12
98%
#784
Core i5-5675C
MSRP: $276|Avg: $66
98%
#785
Core i5-2380P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $25
98%
#786
Core i5-4690
MSRP: $272|Avg: $120
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i3-8130U leads in gaming performance. However, the A10-9700 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-8130UA10-9700
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-8130UA10-9700
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-8130U and A10-9700

Intel

Core i3-8130U

The Core i3-8130U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,521 points. Launch price was $281.

AMD

A10-9700

The A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,555 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Core i3-8130U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A10-9700 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A10-9700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-8130U versus 3.8 GHz on the A10-9700 — a 11.1% clock advantage for the A10-9700 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i3-8130U uses the Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the A10-9700 uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-8130U scores 3,521 against the A10-9700's 3,555 — a 1% lead for the A10-9700. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,050 vs 642, a 48.2% lead for the Core i3-8130U that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-8130U vs 0 kB on the A10-9700.

FeatureCore i3-8130UA10-9700
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
3.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.5 GHz+59%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2048 kB+700%
Process
14 nm-50%
28 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019)
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
3,521
3,555
Geekbench 6 Single
1,050+64%
642
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-8130U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A10-9700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. The A10-9700 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i3-8130U) vs 8 (A10-9700) — the Core i3-8130U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i3-8130UA10-9700
Socket
BGA1356
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
64 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12+50%
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-8130U) vs AMD-V (A10-9700). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 620 (Core i3-8130U) and Radeon R7 (A10-9700) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8130U targets Mainstream Laptop, A10-9700 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-8130U rivals Ryzen 3 2200U; A10-9700 rivals Pentium G4560.

FeatureCore i3-8130UA10-9700
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 620
Radeon R7
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop
Budget