Core i3-8300 vs Xeon E3-1268L v5

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-8300 vs Xeon E3-1268L v5 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-8300 vs Xeon E3-1268L v5: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-8300

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $239 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $377 MSRP).
✅Delivers 174.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.2 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $377 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E3-1268L v5 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E3-1268L v5.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1268L v5, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌77.1% higher power demand at 62W vs 35W.

Xeon E3-1268L v5

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
✅Draws 35W instead of 62W, a 27W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,334 vs 6,370).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.8 vs 46.2 PassMark/$ ($377 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-8300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-8300.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-8300 better than Xeon E3-1268L v5?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1268L v5 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-8300 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-8300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-8300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-8300 is the better buy right now. Core i3-8300 comes in $239 cheaper on MSRP at $138 MSRP versus $377 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 174.7% better value on MSRP (46.2 vs 16.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-8300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-8300 vs Xeon E3-1268L v5 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-8300

The Core i3-8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 6,370 points. Launch price was $138.

Xeon E3-1268L v5

The Xeon E3-1268L v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,334 points. Launch price was $377.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-8300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1268L v5's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i3-8300 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1268L v5 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-8300 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i3-8300 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1268L v5 uses Skylake-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-8300 scores 6,370 against the Xeon E3-1268L v5's 6,334 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-8300. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-8300	Xeon E3-1268L v5
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+9%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+54%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Skylake-DT (2015)
PassMark	6,370	6,334
Geekbench 6 Single	1,327	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1151 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Core i3-8300	Xeon E3-1268L v5
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-8300) / not specified (Xeon E3-1268L v5). The Core i3-8300 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E3-1268L v5 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8300 targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-8300 rivals Ryzen 3 2300X.

Feature	Core i3-8300	Xeon E3-1268L v5
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Mainstream Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-8300 was priced at $138, while the Xeon E3-1268L v5 came in at $377. On launch pricing ($138 vs $377), Core i3-8300 was $239 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-8300 delivers 46.2 pts/$ vs 16.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1268L v5 — making the Core i3-8300 the 93.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-8300	Xeon E3-1268L v5
MSRP	$138-63%	$377
Performance per Dollar	46.2+175%	16.8
Release Date	2018	2015

Search Core i3-8300 on Amazon

Search Xeon E3-1268L v5 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.