Core i5-10200H vs Core i7-9850HL

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10200H vs Core i7-9850HL FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10200H vs Core i7-9850HL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10200H

2020

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9850HL across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 9 MB).
❌80% higher power demand at 45W vs 25W.

Core i7-9850HL

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (9 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 25W instead of 45W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,897 vs 7,997).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10200H better than Core i7-9850HL?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-9850HL is ahead with a 6.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10200H pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark. Core i7-9850HL also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (9 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10200H is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10200H still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-10200H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10200H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-10200H vs Core i7-9850HL Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10200H

The Core i5-10200H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,997 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-9850HL

The Core i7-9850HL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,897 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10200H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-9850HL offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-9850HL has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-10200H versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i7-9850HL — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i5-10200H uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-9850HL uses Coffee Lake-HR (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10200H scores 7,997 against the Core i7-9850HL's 7,897 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i5-10200H. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10200H vs 9 MB (total) on the Core i7-9850HL.

Feature	Core i5-10200H	Core i7-9850HL
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+26%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	9 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-H (2020)	Coffee Lake-HR (2019)
PassMark	7,997+1%	7,897
Cinebench R23 Multi	5,372	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,300	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,392	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the BGA1440 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Core i5-10200H versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9850HL — the Core i5-10200H supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10200H supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 400 Series,Intel 500 Series (Core i5-10200H) and Intel 300 series (Core i7-9850HL).

Feature	Core i5-10200H	Core i7-9850HL
Socket	BGA1440	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933+10%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i5-10200H) / not specified (Core i7-9850HL). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics (Core i5-10200H) and Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9850HL) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.