
Core i5-10300H
Popular choices:

Core i7-8569U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10300H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i7-8569U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
Core i7-8569U
2019Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10300H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,135 vs 8,209).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10300H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-10300H
2020Core i7-8569U
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i7-8569U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10300H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,135 vs 8,209).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10300H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10300H better than Core i7-8569U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10300H | Core i7-8569U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10300H | Core i7-8569U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 113 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10300H | Core i7-8569U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10300H | Core i7-8569U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10300H and Core i7-8569U

Core i5-10300H
Core i5-10300H
The Core i5-10300H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,209 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-8569U
Core i7-8569U
The Core i7-8569U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2019 (6 years ago). It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 8,135 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-10300H and Core i7-8569U share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-10300H versus 4.7 GHz on the Core i7-8569U — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-8569U (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-10300H is built on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-10300H scores 8,209 against the Core i7-8569U's 8,135 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-10300H. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10300H vs 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i7-8569U.
| Feature | Core i5-10300H | Core i7-8569U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.7 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.8 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-H (2020) | — |
| PassMark | 8,209 | 8,135 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,533 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10300H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-8569U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10300H | Core i7-8569U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | FCBGA1528 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-10300H) / not specified (Core i7-8569U). The Core i5-10300H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i7-8569U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10300H targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10300H rivals Ryzen 5 4600H.
| Feature | Core i5-10300H | Core i7-8569U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Performance Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













