Core i5-10300H vs Xeon E3-1230 v6

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10300H vs Xeon E3-1230 v6 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10300H vs Xeon E3-1230 v6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10300H

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 72W, a 27W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E3-1230 v6 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Xeon E3-1230 v6

2017

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10300H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,113 vs 8,209).
❌60% higher power demand at 72W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10300H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10300H better than Xeon E3-1230 v6?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1230 v6 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10300H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10300H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10300H is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10300H still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-10300H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10300H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-10300H vs Xeon E3-1230 v6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10300H

The Core i5-10300H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,209 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1230 v6

The Xeon E3-1230 v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 72 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 8,113 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-10300H and Xeon E3-1230 v6 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-10300H versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E3-1230 v6 — a 14.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-10300H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-10300H uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1230 v6 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10300H scores 8,209 against the Xeon E3-1230 v6's 8,113 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-10300H. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10300H vs 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1230 v6.

Feature	Core i5-10300H	Xeon E3-1230 v6
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+15%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.5 GHz+40%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-H (2020)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	8,209+1%	8,113
Geekbench 6 Single	1,533	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10300H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1230 v6 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-10300H	Xeon E3-1230 v6
Socket	BGA1440	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-10300H) / not specified (Xeon E3-1230 v6). The Core i5-10300H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E3-1230 v6 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10300H targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10300H rivals Ryzen 5 4600H.