
Core i5-1035G4
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 2300X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-1035G4
2019Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus Graphics G4, while Ryzen 3 2300X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 3 2300X
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,564 vs 7,658).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Core i5-1035G4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1035G4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-1035G4
2019Ryzen 3 2300X
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus Graphics G4, while Ryzen 3 2300X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,564 vs 7,658).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Core i5-1035G4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1035G4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-1035G4 better than Ryzen 3 2300X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-1035G4 | Ryzen 3 2300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-1035G4 | Ryzen 3 2300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 86 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-1035G4 | Ryzen 3 2300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 156 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-1035G4 | Ryzen 3 2300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1035G4 and Ryzen 3 2300X

Core i5-1035G4
Core i5-1035G4
The Core i5-1035G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1526. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,658 points. Launch price was $320.


Ryzen 3 2300X
Ryzen 3 2300X
The Ryzen 3 2300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 7,564 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1035G4 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 2300X's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-1035G4 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 3 2300X — a 12.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 2300X (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-1035G4 uses the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 3 2300X uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1035G4 scores 7,658 against the Ryzen 3 2300X's 7,564 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-1035G4. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-1035G4 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 2300X.
| Feature | Core i5-1035G4 | Ryzen 3 2300X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.2 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz+218% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Ice Lake (Client) (2019) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 7,658+1% | 7,564 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 4,332 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 922 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,919 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1035G4 uses the FCBGA1526 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 2300X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-1035G4 | Ryzen 3 2300X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1526 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-1035G4) / not specified (Ryzen 3 2300X). The Core i5-1035G4 includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics G4), while the Ryzen 3 2300X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1035G4 targets Ultra-portable laptops. Direct competitor: Core i5-1035G4 rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.
| Feature | Core i5-1035G4 | Ryzen 3 2300X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Plus Graphics G4 | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Ultra-portable laptops | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











