Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon E3-1575M v5

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon E3-1575M v5 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon E3-1575M v5: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-1035G4

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus Graphics G4, while Xeon E3-1575M v5 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,658 vs 7,727).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Xeon E3-1575M v5

2016

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1035G4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1575M v5 better than Core i5-1035G4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1575M v5 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-1035G4 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1575M v5 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1575M v5 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1575M v5 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E3-1575M v5 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-1035G4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon E3-1575M v5 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1035G4

The Core i5-1035G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1526. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,658 points. Launch price was $320.

Xeon E3-1575M v5

The Xeon E3-1575M v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-H (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,727 points. Launch price was $1,207.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-1035G4 and Xeon E3-1575M v5 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-1035G4 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E3-1575M v5 — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1575M v5 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-1035G4 uses the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E3-1575M v5 uses Skylake-H (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1035G4 scores 7,658 against the Xeon E3-1575M v5's 7,727 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E3-1575M v5. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-1035G4 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1575M v5.

Feature	Core i5-1035G4	Xeon E3-1575M v5
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	3.9 GHz+5%
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	3 GHz+173%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake (Client) (2019)	Skylake-H (2015−2016)
PassMark	7,658	7,727
Cinebench R23 Multi	4,332	—
Geekbench 6 Single	922	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,919	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1035G4 uses the FCBGA1526 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1575M v5 uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-1035G4	Xeon E3-1575M v5
Socket	FCBGA1526	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-1035G4) / not specified (Xeon E3-1575M v5). The Core i5-1035G4 includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics G4), while the Xeon E3-1575M v5 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1035G4 targets Ultra-portable laptops. Direct competitor: Core i5-1035G4 rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.