Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon E5-2640 v2
Core i5-1035G4
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-1035G4 is positioned at rank 791 and the Xeon E5-2640 v2 is on rank 1023, so the Core i5-1035G4 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-1035G4
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2640 v2
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-1035G4 | Xeon E5-2640 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($530) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake (Client) (2019) / 10 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-1035G4 | Xeon E5-2640 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($530) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1035G4 and Xeon E5-2640 v2
Core i5-1035G4
The Core i5-1035G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1526. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,658 points. Launch price was $320.
Xeon E5-2640 v2
The Xeon E5-2640 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,625 points. Launch price was $728.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1035G4 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2640 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2640 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-1035G4 versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2640 v2 — a 38.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-1035G4 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-1035G4 uses the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-2640 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1035G4 scores 7,658 against the Xeon E5-2640 v2's 7,625 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-1035G4. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-1035G4 vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2640 v2.
| Feature | Core i5-1035G4 | Xeon E5-2640 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+48% | 2.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 2 GHz+82% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+233% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-55% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Ice Lake (Client) (2019) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 7,658 | 7,625 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 4,332 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 922 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,919 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1035G4 uses the FCBGA1526 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2640 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733 on the Core i5-1035G4 versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E5-2640 v2 — the Core i5-1035G4 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2640 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-1035G4) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2640 v2). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-1035G4) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2640 v2) — the Xeon E5-2640 v2 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-1035G4 | Xeon E5-2640 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1526 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733+33% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 768 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 40+150% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-1035G4) / not specified (Xeon E5-2640 v2). The Core i5-1035G4 includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics G4), while the Xeon E5-2640 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1035G4 targets Ultra-portable laptops. Direct competitor: Core i5-1035G4 rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.
| Feature | Core i5-1035G4 | Xeon E5-2640 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Iris Plus Graphics G4 | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Ultra-portable laptops | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-1035G4 and Xeon E5-2640 v2
