
Core i5-1035G4

Xeon E5-2650L v2
Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon E5-2650L v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon E5-2650L v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon E5-2650L v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-1035G4
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 70W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus Graphics G4, while Xeon E5-2650L v2 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2650L v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2650L v2, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
Xeon E5-2650L v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+316.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,612 vs 7,658).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $4,115 MSRP, while Core i5-1035G4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 70W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1035G4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-1035G4 better than Xeon E5-2650L v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon E5-2650L v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1035G4
The Core i5-1035G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1526. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,658 points. Launch price was $320.

Xeon E5-2650L v2
The Xeon E5-2650L v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,612 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1035G4 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2650L v2 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2650L v2 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-1035G4 versus 2.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650L v2 — a 55.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-1035G4 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i5-1035G4 uses the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-2650L v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1035G4 scores 7,658 against the Xeon E5-2650L v2's 7,612 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i5-1035G4. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-1035G4 vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650L v2.
| Feature | Core i5-1035G4 | Xeon E5-2650L v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 10 / 20+150% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+76% | 2.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 1.7 GHz+55% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+317% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-55% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Ice Lake (Client) (2019) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 7,658 | 7,612 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 4,332 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 922 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,919 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1035G4 uses the FCBGA1526 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2650L v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-1035G4 | Xeon E5-2650L v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1526 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-1035G4) / not specified (Xeon E5-2650L v2). The Core i5-1035G4 includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics G4), while the Xeon E5-2650L v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1035G4 targets Ultra-portable laptops. Direct competitor: Core i5-1035G4 rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.
| Feature | Core i5-1035G4 | Xeon E5-2650L v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Plus Graphics G4 | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Ultra-portable laptops | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













